I understand the example.
I just want to ask you about a couple of things in the statistics. On page five you set out the overall crime rates showing, of course, there and on the next slide, that they're much higher in the north. I wonder if some of that has to do with a greater propensity to charge or greater reporting that might occur. Just in general, the stats are much higher in the north, as you point out. I wonder, aside from the difference in the population—you mentioned more indigenous people—could this just be better stats on reporting or more charging opportunity there? Why would that be?