Yes. As I said, call it grievous aggravated assault, or call it torturous assault, but don't call it torture, because we already have an offence of torture, which is understood and well defined in international law. We should not be creating any doubts that there is only one definition of torture in the world internationally, and that is the one in 269.1.
Parliament is free to create other offences, but it should not create any confusion by creating another offence that somehow overlaps with torture or is a lesser form of torture.