I'm not sure that it would.
We have aggravated sexual assault. Does that make victims feel better than simply having one offence of sexual assault?
The issue, as I said in my previous answer, is that if victims want a certain recognition that intentional infliction of harm is different from a reckless infliction of harm, then Parliament is free to create a new offence of intentionally causing assault which intentionally causes physical or mental harm.
In creating that offence, they should not confuse it with the offence of torture, which has a well-defined understanding in international law.