Yes. I'm looking forward to it. I think we're going to actually see this, which I think will be helpful, and we're going to talk to the manufacturers about that.
Most, if not all, provinces have something like the Motor Vehicle Act of British Columbia. It has the very common provision that a police officer can stop your car, and you have to provide your name and address in certain circumstances. Currently, police officers can require a breath sample only if they have reasonable grounds to believe a person has alcohol in their system.
In your answer to Mr. Nicholson, you talked about these passive detection devices essentially being just a tool, but they are not just a tool. In your bill, the presence of alcohol is established, the reasonable grounds for the search are established, if the passive detection device indicates there's alcohol around.
It seems to me that might change the way police are using their powers under motor vehicle legislation at the provincial level to stop people. Simply with a little clipboard and this device somewhere nearby, they require people to incriminate themselves, potentially.
I may be overstating that, but doesn't this provide an incredible new tool of a categorically different nature?