What we're doing here, though, is a criminal offence. For example, there has been case law, the Dedman case in the Supreme Court of Canada, dealing with the RIDE program in Ontario. You made the point that driving is a privilege, and therefore, there should be a pretty low charter implication.
Here you're creating a criminal offence. You're renaming it vehicular homicide. Aren't the consequences significant? Isn't it likely a court would be more likely to intervene given the nature of this as opposed to, for example, the Dedman case, which was just an administrative sanction?