Okay, that's fair enough.
Now this is really playing the devil's advocate, from a defence lawyer's point of view. I know over the years, going back into the seventies and the eighties, there were people who refused to take a Breathalyzer test because they'd rather be convicted of that than to be convicted of impaired driving.
Do you think that this would be an added incentive for people to refuse to co-operate with the police if they are guilty of a crime like this, and to not have the Breathalyzer test or anything else? Do you think this might be an added incentive, if they potentially face the possibility of a homicide conviction?