Thank you, Chair.
Mr. Falk touched on an interesting line of questions that I would like to continue. Clause 3 states:
It is prohibited for any person to require an individual to undergo a genetic test as a condition of (a) providing goods or services to that individual;
I can see medical treatment as a service, so that makes sense to me. Also, it states:
entering into or continuing a contract or agreement with that individual;
If that kind of contract is related to the providing of treatment, that makes sense to me. As well, there is:
offering or continuing specific terms or conditions in a contract or agreement with that individual.
Again, if it were all about treatment, that would make sense to me.
However, the exclusions in clause 6 are far broader than that, in my view. I would agree with Mr. Falk on this point. If that exception were to be reduced to the aspect of providing treatment to an individual, I think I'd be okay with that. Would you like to comment on that?