This touches on what Mr. Nicholson mentioned with regard to the building of jurisprudence. I think he mentioned that similar thoughts were expressed in 1992, when the court challenges program was cancelled for the first time, basically saying that one of the reasons was that there was no longer a purpose, since it had supported the establishment of a solid body of case law pertaining to charter rights.
I wonder if you can comment on the amount of jurisprudence that came forward between 1994, when the program was restored, and 2006, when it was cancelled again, in relation to equality rights and language rights.