Evidence of meeting #46 for Justice and Human Rights in the 42nd Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was religious.

A video is available from Parliament.

hate crimescommunity centrereligiouscoveredpublic propertiesprivatebuildingscriminal codecrimecoffee shopmischiefchange the habitsplace of worshipbuilding or structureused for administrativeschoolpropertysubsectionquestions

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Chandra Arya Liberal Nepean, ON

Yes.

As spoken

Alistair MacGregor NDP Cowichan—Malahat—Langford, BC

Every business does administrative activities. That's a very broad term. So if something is done that is motivated by those biases, is that net capturing those private businesses?

As spoken

Chandra Arya Liberal Nepean, ON

No, that was not the intent of the bill. It was only for—

As spoken

Alistair MacGregor NDP Cowichan—Malahat—Langford, BC

But do you have concerns, because that definition of “administrative”—

As spoken

Chandra Arya Liberal Nepean, ON

I know; I understand that.

As spoken

Alistair MacGregor NDP Cowichan—Malahat—Langford, BC

Right? Yes.

As spoken

Chandra Arya Liberal Nepean, ON

It was not the intent of the bill to cover this.

As spoken

Alistair MacGregor NDP Cowichan—Malahat—Langford, BC

It was not the intention to do that. Okay.

Thank you.

As spoken

The Chair Liberal Anthony Housefather

Mr. McKinnon.

As spoken

Ron McKinnon Liberal Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam, BC

Thank you, Chair.

I have one more question about scope. I understand here from proposed paragraph (c) that a building or structure for all of these purposes, or things associated with that structure, presumably on the grounds, would be covered. So if you had a public park with a camp shelter for barbecues and so forth, then all the benches and basically everything else in the park would be covered. But if you had a public park that had no such structure, nothing would be covered. Is that how you would read this?

As spoken

Chandra Arya Liberal Nepean, ON

Interesting. I think that is not covered in the bill as I see it.

As spoken

Ron McKinnon Liberal Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam, BC

Okay. So it needs to be tied to a building or a structure in order to activate—

As spoken

4:05 p.m.

Conservative

Rob Nicholson Conservative Niagara Falls, ON

To activate the increased penalty.

As spoken

Ron McKinnon Liberal Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam, BC

Yes, the increased penalty.

As spoken

4:05 p.m.

Conservative

Rob Nicholson Conservative Niagara Falls, ON

If you commit a crime, it's still a crime.

As spoken

Ron McKinnon Liberal Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam, BC

Okay, thank you.

As spoken

The Chair Liberal Anthony Housefather

Excellent.

I think that was a really interesting and excellent exchange. I want to thank Mr. Arya for coming before us today. Thank you so much for your excellent presentation, and we look forward to studying the bill you have proposed.

As spoken

Chandra Arya Liberal Nepean, ON

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you, all.

As spoken

The Chair Liberal Anthony Housefather

Thank you, everyone.

The meeting is adjourned.

As spoken