That's interesting.
I think it bears being put on the record that where the community finds itself in a challenge, not in my city only but also across the country, is that when such an incident happens, the police are not always properly equipped to see that as mischief versus a hate crime. It's not a sufficient threshold to be considered a hate crime, so the case never even gets taken up.
If we were able to change that “primarily used by” provision, it would then open up and be something that the police could pursue as a mischief charge, not necessarily as a hate crime.
So that's helpful, and I appreciate that.
On gender expression, just add it after gender identity?