Since it's already covered by section 145, which is a person convicted of a failure to appear or not having appeared when requested to do so by the court, why is proposed subparagraph (v) necessary?
Liberal
Colin Fraser Liberal West Nova, NS
Since it's already covered by section 145, which is a person convicted of a failure to appear or not having appeared when requested to do so by the court, why is proposed subparagraph (v) necessary?
See context to find out what was said next.