That again is information that would be in the mix already. In the Alberta bail report, that type of information was expressly noted as to always be presented and always available. It's not determinative.
When we look at paragraph 515(10)(c) the test is to look at all the factors that are expressly enumerated and other factors that may be applicable. In the Hall decision and the St-Cloud decision, the Supreme Court has been clear. No one factor trumps another. It's not a matter of taking one and basing it on one. It's a matter of looking at all the circumstances in the individual case.