I just have one quick final question. I mentioned it to Mr. Trudell. Changing “may” to “shall” with respect to proposed subparagraphs (i), (ii), and (iii) really is a symbolic change. You yourself testified that this is something that happens as a matter of fact. Since there is no criminal consequence or consequence of any kind for a mistake occurring, these mistakes can happen again and there is no consequence. If these actions already happen as a matter of fact, there is no consequence to doing it. Isn't this a symbolic change, and aren't we overstating the potential public safety benefits of this bill?
On April 4th, 2017. See this statement in context.