I have a question for Mr. Doob, and I want to follow up on one of Mr. Bittle's questions earlier.
He asked whether there is a potential, particularly in light of the Jordan decision, that because of procedural delays—whether because a number of adjournments have happened or there's a longer time to produce a record that the court feels is reliable—it could make us less safe. You responded by essentially saying that this narrow provision misses the point; we need to do an overhaul of the entire section.
I think doing an overhaul of the section is actually a great idea. If, for whatever reason, an overhaul is not done and this specific change made, with the way that the section is phrased today, I do have fear that we could be made less safe. Would you agree that's a reasonable outcome?