No. The reason is this. I wasn't a politician, but I was an activist in my community back in the 1980s when the court challenges program was put into place. The court challenges program was supremely effective at pushing back on the Quebec government, largely on major issues that concern the vitality of our community and our language. We then saw it abolished in 1992. The good thing is that there was a short gap before it was reinstated. We see the differences between it and the existing program, which was put into place after a court challenge, by the previous government. It did not reinstate the court challenges program but put into place the language access rights program.
There is a major difference. It is not as effective. It is not as accessible, and that whole experience has simply driven home the point that FCFA and QCGN are trying to make here, that it's not good enough to have a government program for which the government is actually responsible for governance, and the very survival of that program is based on the whim and the will of whatever government is in place.
It should, in fact, be a separate institution created by an act of Parliament, reporting to Parliament, endowed with capital funds to start off, and able to solicit funds from private sources as well, and that would provide a greater measure of protection for the two official language communities across Quebec than any program will do.