I would like to thank all three of the witnesses for appearing before us, in particular, the very compelling testimony that we heard from Ms. Kaulius and of course Professor Hogg, who is the pre-eminent scholar in constitutional law.
If I could first start off with Professor Hogg, you were kind and good enough to actually refer to some case law, providing us with evidence perhaps that this legislation would be perfectly fine under section 20, that it would be safe, and you referred to case law. You did not do the same for section 9. Is there any particular case law that we should have the opportunity to review?