Mr. DelBigio, you said that the levels of alcohol or drugs are not relevant. You suggested that someone was saying that.
Weren't those who were testifying saying to us that they're not the only measure of a person's impairment? Don't you believe that someone who perhaps has never tasted alcohol before who has a couple of drinks may in fact be impaired, quite apart from whatever level is in his or her blood system? Someone who is used to drinking a lot of alcohol may have several drinks and in fact may not be impaired. It's just one of the tests.
Isn't that a fairer description of what they're talking about?