Yes. I hope I missed something. I hope I'm wrong on it, because it doesn't make much sense, but the combination of proposed section 320.28 eliminating three hours, allowing samples to be taken hours or even a day after on reasonable and probable grounds, that seems clear. Those samples would, by definition, be taken outside the two-hour limit from operation of the vehicle. That seems clear. Then you turn to proposed section 320.31, which seems like a clear roll-up of the levels and I couldn't see any section of the code that says that it doesn't apply or it doesn't apply in ridiculous situations. I didn't see it there. It seems on its face that's the plain reading. It can't be right.
On September 20th, 2017. See this statement in context.