I think you make an excellent point there.
I want to go back to Ms. Latimer of the John Howard Society and build on something that my colleague Mr. Boissonnault was asking you about.
It's pretty obvious that if there's going to be mandatory alcohol screening, we're going to have charter challenges. I'm playing devil's advocate here. If the benefits are so significant, as we've seen in getting people off the road and in fact reducing the number of people who are charged because of the deterrence effect, which we heard is the Irish experience—Mothers against Drunk Drivers told us that—so what if there's a charter challenge or two or three?
That's what happens all the time with criminal justice reform. Once we have those challenges under our belt, then we'll have an understanding of what the law is and we move on and save lives. What's wrong with that?