Thanks, Mr. Chair.
Thank you all for presenting today. I appreciate it.
I'll start with Ms. Latimer. Regarding the Irish experience after mandatory roadside testing, it's important to maybe correct something from your testimony. We're not compelling people to give blood in a mandatory roadside screen. It's Breathalyzer. It's breath; that's the mandatory screen, not blood. I think that's important for the record.
The Irish experience showed a decrease, from 2006 levels to 2015, of 40% in the number of charges laid, because of the sophistication of the roadside testing. That tells me there's less pressure on the Irish criminal justice system now than there was in 2006.
I understand you said there could be charter challenges. We saw that with per se levels in 2008. It's using legal testimony before it has rinsed its way through the system.
We heard from Professor Hogg, who put that through his own screen. He didn't see any grounds on which it would be objectionable from a charter challenge perspective on sections 8, 9, or 10, and we'd be saved by section 1. I wonder if you can tell us specifically where you think there would be a charter challenge.