The only difficulty, aside from the lack of my time, is that your standard of 10, which I think is very fair, by the way, to employees based on the evidence we've heard, is a long way from what the government is contemplating in this bill, so it's the utility of that. This is not the law that would create a federal-wide, safety sensitive standard.
But I want to go back to testimony we had from the last witness, which was a company called ACS, Alcohol Countermeasure Systems. They provided allegedly scientific evidence, from Drs. Huestis and Cone, where they argued that saliva is as reliable as blood testing and it is of course much easier and less intrusive than blood testing. Therefore, the burden of what they were suggesting to this committee was we don't need blood testing at all, which would probably change a lot of things in the bill.
I'd like the reaction of Public Safety and the Department of Justice to that assertion.