I would. I think it's a great starting point to begin to map out or to give judges some guidance that we're not only looking at unconsciousness, but someone can be incapable if they do not meet three basic criteria. These criteria were already set out in a Supreme Court decision on this issue. I think they are very basic principles. If a woman is incapable of really talking, and there may be evidence that she couldn't speak or she didn't understand what was going on, you then have really clear evidence that she's not capable of giving a legally valid consent.
Those three guiding points are not specific. I'm not talking about how much drugs she has to have consumed or how much alcohol the person has to have consumed. I don't think we can really do that in legislation, at least not at this point, but I think we can set guiding principles that are legal principles as to what conditions are necessary before a person has the legal capacity to consent.