Thanks very much.
I'll now turn to the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada. I appreciated your presentations and your thoughtful comments about the extra protection granted by section 176, from your perspective. In my understanding of section 176, this is actually not a charge that is laid very often in Canada. I know there are examples—in fact, one here in Ottawa, where it was laid not that long ago, although I believe the person wasn't convicted of that.
In your estimation, is there a reason why this type of charge would not be laid more often? If there is, is it because there are other protections in the code already that are maybe easier to prove?