Tomorrow is the anniversary of Martin Luther nailing his theses to the door and kicking off the great Reformation. I don't think section 176 would apply to him anyway, because he just wrote a document and nailed it to the door. He didn't interrupt a Catholic mass. To the best of my knowledge, he didn't proceed to go inside and yell at people or stop people from entering the church.
I have a few questions for ARPA. I read your seven-page document, and I thought I understood some of the implications of getting rid of section 176, keeping it, or amending it. Those are the three options on the table. You talk on page six about borderline instances. You ask how the removal of section 176 would impact borderline instances. Can you explain what you mean by borderline instances?