I'm fairly sure that court staff, like court reporters and interpreters, receive access to counselling because they sit in those court rooms every day. Maybe the same person who is available to them could become available to jurors at the end of the day, if they feel the need to or go back.
As Patrick said, some people can walk away from a trial and say, “Okay, we're good. I'm good.” Some people may not be able to survive without having counselling.
I don't think it has to be mandated, but I think it needs to be offered. At the end of a trial that is particularly gruesome, the courts can say, “This is available to you. Please feel free.”
Some people, like these gentlemen, were employed. I was not employed. I was a stay-at-home mom. As a stay-at-home mom or a senior citizen, I don't have access to company benefits, so this comes out of my own pocket, if I am not offered it through the court system. How do those people—what do you say? “I can't afford to go to see a counsellor that charges me $300 an hour 20 times.”
As citizens, we are doing our duty. In turn, I think the country has to do its duty to provide for us.