I want to thank all the witnesses for their thoughtful presentations. I have questions to all of you, if I may, in the short amount of time available.
First of all to you, Ms. Lugtig, a structural question. You mentioned, for example, in your fifth suggestion on expanding the mandate, that we consider funding for test cases raising aboriginal treaty indigenous rights and you suggested it may be important to house it in a separate arm of the program. We've heard on the minority languages issue a similar suggestion that we create essentially a separate arm of the program to deal with those rights. Is it a concern to you that it could get unwieldy if we have various arms, and what about leaving it as it was before 2012 with an aboriginal test case funding program housed in a different department?