I think so, especially if it's proportional to the number of people in each province who would be serving on a jury. This is as long as it's not a fixed amount. When things are starting out, it can be more of a pilot. If you're finding that it might help to put more money into, for example, counselling services during the trial as well as evidenced-based treatment afterwards, you might have to tweak that just to see what works in the long term. It might take a while to see what the optimal amount is.
I do think this is something that should be across Canada. Why should some people in Ontario—it is wonderful that we have access to this now—get support after serving on a jury when someone in the next province doesn't have that?