Thank you, all, very much for your interesting words. I appreciate it very much.
Mr. Trudell, I just want to turn back to section 649 that you referenced. My understanding of that provision of the Criminal Code is to ensure that there is confidentiality about what discussions take place in the deliberations of a jury—there's good reason for that—and to ensure that full and frank conversations about how they arrive at a decision are kept in that jury room.
If an exception is made for therapeutic purposes, as you say, or whatever wording could be used so that a person could seek some help to talk about the discussions that took place in that room, is it your understanding that this information would obviously be confidential with a mental health professional or whoever? What would your opinion be about the compellability of that witness? Would it be privileged information and not admissible in court in any future proceedings or in any appeal, for example, on things that happen in the jury room?