Yes, I wish you hadn't said “write books”, because when I speak to jurors, students, or anybody else, the first thing I say to them is that if their understanding of the jury system in Victoria is based on American TV, they have to get that out of their head. I always say, yes, they can go and write a book, and CNN can interview them, but for us, section 78 of our act sets out a provision that sounds similar to what you have, which is that the deliberations are sacrosanct, that a juror can't discuss the deliberations.
Interestingly, it says, in subsection 78(5):
Nothing [in those previous subsections] prevents a person who has been a juror from disclosing any statements made, opinions expressed, arguments advanced or votes cast in the course of the deliberations of that jury to a registered medical practitioner or a registered psychologist in the course of treatment in relation to issues arising out of the person's service....
It's very explicit.