Unfortunately, that's probably the area where implementation has not worked so well, because it tends to be very ad hoc. Texas and Alaska have both enacted legislation that essentially grants the local clerk of court the authority to create a mental health or a juror support program, but it doesn't actually require them to do so nor does it provide any funding for them to do so. It's really been undertaken on a court-by-court basis, by either a judge or a clerk of court who has been particularly concerned about this issue and has reached out to do this.
Again, it depends an awful lot on the judicial training, and whether or not the judges and the court staff are aware that jurors are experiencing difficulty in a particular trial and know that these resources exist. There are often some gaps in how these services get rolled out. Even where they exist, they tend to be underutilized.