My interpretation of it wasn't quite like that. We already look at several different avenues to identify it. The bill, as I read it, is not indicating that a client must be assessed and a diagnosis, if the condition exists, be made. What the bill is suggesting is that we as probation and parole officers write pre-sentence reports and must consider mental health issues and the availability of resources.
That's why I say that it's something we already do. I don't see the scope as being much larger. If the information is there and we have the means to gather that information, which is the big sticking point as far as I'm concerned, then it goes in the report.