Thank you to the witnesses for your testimony today.
I'm trying to clarify something.
Mr. Embry, you've spoken a number of times about the relevance of a mental illness or mental disorder to the crime that has been committed by an offender. But my take on the importance of a judge's knowing the mental illness or mental disorder was that it would impact what kind of sentence the judge would bestow upon this person or this offender.
If somebody is, for example, convicted of fraud but has anorexia, that would hopefully in my opinion impact the way a judge would choose to punish this person who has committed fraud.
Is that a correct analysis of how a pre-sentencing report is read that would include information on a mental disorder?