Ms. Latimer, you indicated your general support for the bill, subject to relevancy and consent. Mr. Embry in his testimony cited, among other things, the Ellis decision and some case law and so on. From the standpoint of relevancy and consent, what do you say to his point that it's unnecessary or that it's duplicative in a best-case scenario, in his interpretation of the bill?
On May 1st, 2018. See this statement in context.