The subamendment means that Mr. Rankin's original amendment is amended to include the new wording, as opposed to the old wording. To vote on the amendment itself will require a new vote where we would decide whether to add Mr. Rankin's amendment with the subamendment to the bill.
Basically, that's my understanding of what we're doing right now. We've amended Mr. Rankin's original amendment to now read as revised. Now we would move back to the core of the amendment itself, as revised.
Is there any further discussion on the amendment as revised? Do you want to offer any comment, Mr. Fraser?