Thanks to all the witnesses. I'm going to start with Ms. Mahon from Pivot Legal Society.
Thank you for your remarks. You made a couple of key points at the start, one of which was the definition of “human trafficking” in Canadian law. I want to see if I have this right. It was too broad as compared to the UN protocol, which requires an element of coercion, whereas our system seems to require a element of exploitation, but no evidence of a state of mind. Do I have that right so far? Is that what you're saying?