I share the concern around the table that it is fundamental that we maintain judicial independence in our system, and I respect that principle. It's part of my DNA.
We're trying to achieve a delicate balance here. We are trying to make sure that judges who hear sexual assault cases have the appropriate degree of training and also that they are accountable. Your question really touches on the accountability.
The gathering of statistics, as has been pointed out, in an innominate fashion—so people's names won't be attached and we won't be able to identify judges—still helps in seeing how successful we are in making sure that the bench is well trained generally. It allows us to say, okay, we're doing well and we don't need to go further. It may allow us down the road to say maybe we're not doing enough and ask if there is another way we could ensure that judges are better trained or the bench could be better prepared. It just helps us as an accounting matter.