Absolutely, Madam Chair. I will respond to what Mr. Virani said. We made an argument at the time about a slippery slope. There is the speed with which the government is first saying these safeguards are necessary, and then removing safeguards. We see this process continuing.
It's evident in his comments again today when he says that there's going to be a statutory review of that issue. He knows that the Council of Canadian Academies looked at these same issues, and it said to be very cautious. The purpose of a statutory review should be to look at how well the legislation is working in general. It's very striking that we have the parliamentary secretary saying that the government is going to define the scope of the statutory review to only look at new additional things.
In terms of his point of order—and I don't think it's really a point of order but more a point of debate—I was making a point about the problems with advance directives, as such, and the way that—