We're not.... I completely understand and agree, Mr. Moore. For example, when you were speaking to the specific amendment, you spoke about how you conferred with your colleagues, and you spoke using the terms “we” and “our”, speaking for your colleagues.
You specifically spoke about the intention behind this specific amendment, CPC-6. You spoke about the impact of increasing the days to 120. They were very healthy points. Then Mr. Lewis talked about the disabilities angle, the deadlines and suicide ideation and how that is all impacted by this amendment.
What I am not understanding is what his most current point is about, so I was hoping that he could come to the relevance of the point he was making so that I could better understand it.
Thank you for that point of order, though, Mr. Moore.
Go ahead, Mr. Lewis. You can continue.