Look, I've said it in the past. I'm always open to good-faith amendments to a bill. That is part of the parliamentary process. If something is already there, I'm not inclined to be open to amendments that are redundant or that are already otherwise captured in the bill. I'm happy to look at the way in which the definitions operate and analyze those. I will obviously look at the CIJA submission very carefully.
I'm open to good-faith amendments, but if it's there and it's already captured, and the best legal advice that we have is that it doesn't need to be improved, then you're going to have to bear the burden of proof of trying to convince me.