I note that, as I read the exemptions, it does not clearly exempt all kinds of medical or therapeutic conversations. It simply provides an exemption for a practice, treatment or service related to gender transition. Then the second exemption, I think, is arguably ambiguous. I would be interested in hearing from the department officials as to whether there would be any problem with incorporating language into the bill that would provide greater certainty.
On December 1st, 2020. See this statement in context.