I want to turn to Dr. Zucker and his concern about this question of what “exploration” means.
I wonder, and I have heard this from many people.... If we replaced “exploration” with something a bit more specific, language along the lines that what's allowed is “the exploration and development of an integrated personal identity, without favouring any particular sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression”, is this the kind of thing that Dr. Zucker is looking for in terms of being more specific in that section of the bill?