Based on the survey I was talking about earlier, I think we get halfway there.... For some people, yes, the services they experienced were framed as being about that second part of the definition, which is to repress or reduce non-heterosexual attraction or sexual behaviour. That's excellent, and I'm grateful that the government is interested in moving toward efforts to stop those practices.
To get all the way there, for all 50 individuals we surveyed, we need to ensure that the definition includes other practices that have the goal of avoiding LGBTQ2 identities. It would then encapsulate services that we know, over time, have been adjusting their language and adjusting how they frame their services to avoid prosecution under municipal codes and other legislative efforts, but will prevent it nationally.