I think that's a huge gap when we're looking at this bill. If you look at the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, gender expression is alluded to within it, if not clearly stated. For this bill to leave that out, I think it's a huge miss.
When we look at conversion therapy, and coming back to my point about this larger systemic and societal viewpoint of what gender is, and what sexual and/or romantic orientation is, we also have to understand that the outdated, archaic mentalities of gender and gender norms certainly do put people in harm's way.
If you look at a young boy who's dressing in “feminine clothing”, and then for this to be seen as an opportunity for conversion to happen because they are not dressing “like a boy”, that itself is concerning if this is not included in the bill.