If there were nothing to worry about, then they wouldn't even be having to add information on the website saying that conversations wouldn't be included. The problem, as I said, is the addition of the phrase “repress or reduce non-heterosexual behaviour”. There are many reasons anyone, even if they don't want to change their sexual orientation or gender identity, would want to reduce sexual behaviour, as I mentioned. There are LGBT people who support what we're saying when it comes to this, because they ought to have the same rights as every other Canadian to access care. There's a difference between banning bad methodologies, which we all agree on doing, and telling Canadians what goals they should be able to achieve.
A counsellor is like a GPS: You plug in the information and she tells you how to get there, but it's our decision to decide where we want to go. If I choose to be chaste and celibate, which I am.... If there were a movie called “The 44-Year-Old Virgin”, I would be the star. That would be me.
The point is that it's my decision. If I have a right to be chaste and celibate, then I ought to have the right to choose a counsellor who I can pay for, just like everybody else.