Okay.
There actually appear to be two definitions in section 320.101. The provision talks about what is banned and, at the end, what is allowed. It is somewhat divided. So I understand the grey areas you are telling us about, but my concern is the exclusion—in other words, what will be allowed.
I think that everyone agrees that conversations in good faith should be allowed. I see them as undirected conversations, but that is what I would really like to hear your opinion on.
How should the exclusion be defined?