I definitely think, in a broader sense, that it is important to identify what the bill does cover and doesn't cover, so I do think an amendment like that would be very helpful.
At the same time, even then I still do think that could leave the door open for some unhealthy interpretation. Even sometimes in different human relationships, there is a difference of power, so it's important to make sure that things are put in place in the bill to prevent different power dynamics in whatever conversation, whether they're personal, private or professional. It is important that there be protections against that as well, so the short answer is yes, but with additional clarification.