Could I just clarify and follow up on my last comment with respect to the U.K. decision?
Members do need to know what was important about that decision. In that decision, children—anyone under the age of 16, for sure, and possibly under 18—were found not to have the capacity to consent to the kind of one-way treatment that this bill will require. They don't have the capacity.
Honestly, I'm trying to help you not having to face the music down the line when we have a whole slew of people coming through. The number of young girls particularly who are going through gender transition now.... In some countries, I'm not sure of Canada's number offhand, but I just saw that Sweden's was a 1,500% increase in young girls over a 10-year period. There's something going on. We need to make an evidence-based decision—