I just think it's a bit erroneous to leave the record reflecting that the minister wasn't open to amendments. He clearly indicated in his testimony before this committee two weeks ago that he was open to amendments, and I believe the issue of entrenching gender expression was directly put to him by Mr. Garrison. I think the record should reflect that. That's what this amendment seeks to do—insert “gender expression” into the definition of what would constitute conversion therapy under proposed section 320.101.
Thank you.