My understanding of that ruling is that this amendment as it stands is not in order. If it requires amendment, it's clearly not in order.
I would ask the chair to rule the amendment out of order, given the previous amendment that was adopted.
On December 10th, 2020. See this statement in context.
Randall Garrison NDP Esquimalt—Saanich—Sooke, BC
My understanding of that ruling is that this amendment as it stands is not in order. If it requires amendment, it's clearly not in order.
I would ask the chair to rule the amendment out of order, given the previous amendment that was adopted.
See context to find out what was said next.