That's a great question, and it's one that I think we have to be really sensitive in answering to make sure that people have equitable access to whatever it is, whatever solutions we put out there around addressing domestic violence.
It's important to note, actually, that coercive control doesn't just relate to domestic violence. It relates to all forms of violence, which I think is of particular importance when looking at marginalized communities, such as people who are from equity-seeking groups, because often the violence that happens in those communities is lateral violence, not just intimate partner violence. Coercive control is also something that can be laid over those communities.
The more we, through our legislation, represent the experiences of people who experience violence, the more likely they are going to be to reach out to the system to get support, because they will see themselves in the system. If we don't just limit it to spousal violence, intimate partner violence, even domestic violence, but understand that lateral violence does exist in different types of communities, I think that we're a little more likely to get the outcome we want of people from marginalized communities feeling that they can come forward.
Having said that, I think that we, as Canada, can always do better in making sure that marginalized communities feel that we, as a country—and our systems—are there to serve them.